FREEDOM UNDER LAW WELCOMES CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGMENT IN SOCIAL GRANTS CASE (April 2026)
Freedom Under Law (FUL) welcomes the judgment handed down by the Constitutional Court (CC) on 8 April 2026 in the matter of Black Sash Trust v Minister of Social Development. FUL was the second applicant in this litigation. The judgment is the latest development in a long-running saga originating in the award of a tender by the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) to Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (CPS) for the payment of social grants. The original contract and subsequent contract between SASSA and CPS were both set aside by the CC. The event is of course of interest to political analysts and followers of MK’s seemingly never-ending churn in leadership positions. But Hlophe’s position in Parliament raises other questions which are important to consider.
READ MORE
CHRIS OXTOBY & JUDITH FEBRUARY | Time to revisit eligibility requirements to be a member of parliament?
Earlier this month, the MK Party announced that it had re-instated John Hlophe as deputy president and party parliamentary leader. Hlophe had been suspended in November 2025, ostensibly for making changes to the position of party chief whip without collective consultation.

The event is of course of interest to political analysts and followers of MK’s seemingly never-ending churn in leadership positions. But Hlophe’s position in Parliament raises other questions which are important to consider.
READ MORE
Freedom under Law deeply concerned by killing of attorney Chinette Gallichan
Media interviews, contact Judith February, Executive Officer, Freedom Under Law 083 453 9817

Freedom Under Law (FUL) is deeply troubled by reports of the killing of attorney Chinette Gallichan. According to news reports, Ms Gallichan was shot in central Johannesburg in broad daylight. It appears that she was on her way to represent the mining company Sibanye-Stillwater at the CCMA. The killing has been described as having the hallmarks of a targeted hit.
READ MORE
JOINT STATEMENT BY CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ON DELAYS IN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT APPOINTMENTS
Civil society organisations committed to the protection of the rule of law and the integrity of South Africa’s constitutional democracy express deep concern at President Cyril Ramaphosa’s delay in appointing judges to the Constitutional Court. It has now been over five months since the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) concluded interviews and submitted its recommendations for appointment of two judges to the Constitutional Court. To our knowledge, this is longest any president in democratic South Africa has taken to appoint judges to the apex court.

The Constitutional Court has not operated at a full complement of 11 permanent judges for several years. The current delay exacerbates the problem
READ MORE
CHRIS OXTOBY & JUDITH FEBRUARY | The Judicial Service Commission in 2026 (March 2026)
The time of year is suddenly upon us when the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) will be interviewing candidates for appointments as judges. As always, this will be a significant event, and there are several issues of interest which will be worth watching. The steady march of time has illustrated concerns about inaction by the President following the JSC’s last sitting in October 2025. Following these interviews, the JSC was finally able to send a list of candidates to the President, from which he will appoint two Constitutional Court judges.
READ MORE
CHRIS OXTOBY & JUDITH FEBRUARY | Is there a crisis of ethics in the South African judiciary?
A recently published article highlighting that Free State judge Mpina Mathebula has been on special leave while criminal proceedings against him are underway has raised more than a few eyebrows. News reports indicate that the judge has not been suspended and there has yet to be a formal complaint of misconduct lodged against him with the Judicial Service Commission (JSC).
READ MORE
CHRIS OXTOBY & JUDITH FEBRUARY | 2026: What lies ahead for the judiciary and the rule of law (February 2026)
If the past few years are any indication, 2026 will be another highly consequential and challenging year for the judiciary and the rule of law. Significant concern regarding the accountability and conduct of members of the judiciary has been simmering for a while. The prevailing narrative about the judiciary was that it was a rare example of a democratic institution that worked effectively, and, particularly in the context of state capture, ensured accountability and protection of the law while other institutions capitulated to political pressure.
READ MORE
FREEDOM UNDER LAW OBJECTS TO THE CANDIDACY OF ADVOCATE MENZI SIMELANE FOR NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (December 2025)
Freedom Under Law has submitted an objection to Menzi Simelane’s nomination as National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP). On 27 November 2025, the Advisory Panel for the selection of the NDPP announced that it had “identified six candidates who met the minimum requirements.” These candidates are advocate Nicolette Bell, advocate Hermione Cronje, advocate Andrea Johnson, advocate Xolisile Khanyile, advocate Adrian Mopp, and advocate Menzi Simelane. The panel invited comments on the suitability or otherwise of these candidates.
READ MORE
CHRIS OXTOBY & JUDITH FEBRUARY | Ethics in the law – should we be concerned? (November 2025)
The wave of recent negative publicity for the legal profession is concerning because it takes place against a backdrop where public trust and confidence in the rule of law and institutions that uphold it are precarious, writes Judith February.
READ MORE
CHRIS OXTOBY & JUDITH FEBRUARY | JSC interviews – Showing a challenging road ahead? (October 2025)
The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has just wrapped up a lengthy sitting which, as is often the case, illustrates many of the significant challenges that face the South African judiciary. Starting on the 7th of October, the JSC interviewed candidates to fill positions on the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA), Labour Court, and several positions on the High Court.
READ MORE

Headlines

The state of the rule of law in SA: Freedom Under Law Chair, Justice Azhar Cachalia in discussion with Ann Bernstein of the Centre for Development Enterprise (CDE)

Azhar Cachalia, former judge of South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal from 2006 until his retirement in 2021, and now a visiting professor at Rhodes University and chairman of Freedom Under Law, joined me in a discussion about the current state of the nation and the rule of law. Cachalia noted that a strong and independent judiciary remains a pillar of South African democracy but cautioned that not all the judges who have been appointed have the necessary experience or competence. In his view, after Jacob Zuma was elected President the judiciary and the JSC became highly politicised. Many candidates who went through the JSC interview

Learn More →

In Defence of the Common Law

Remarks by Retired Judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal Azhar Cachalia, Chair of the Freedom Under Law Board at the Annual Bar Dinner of the Grahamstown Society of Advocates: 21 February 2025 Grahamstown – now Makhanda – is a town for which I have developed a special fondness. Some of my favourite colleagues, including Judges Mpati, Leach, Plasket, Dambuza, Eksteen and Froneman have spent much of their lives here. I have enjoyed hearing their stories about it, but not their descriptions of how it is currently managed. I also have an interest in Rhodes University as a visiting professor. I learnt much about the

Learn More →

Freedom Under Law on decision to interdict Dr Hlophe from participating in the JSC

Freedom Under Law notes decision to interdict Dr Hlophe from participating in the Judicial Service Commission Freedom Under Law notes the decision of the Western Cape High Court to interdict Dr John Hlophe from participating in the activities of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), pending a final decision on challenges to the designation of Dr Hlophe as one of the representatives of the National Assembly (NA) on the JSC. The interdict was granted following applications by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and Corruption Watch (CW), in which interim and then final relief was sought. FUL brought a separate application seeking a final order to set aside

Learn More →

Events

Strengthening the Rule of Law: Challenges and Opportunities for the NPA

Freedom Under Law & Stellenbosch University’s Department of Journalism invite you to a lecture by Shamila Batohi, the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP)

1 November 2024
6 Spin street, Cape Town
17:30 for 18:00

RSVP by 5 November 2024:

– fthomas@freedomunderlaw.org.za
– Light refreshments will be served

Timelines

Timeline of Judge Hlophe’s Removal

DOWNLOAD THE PDF VERSION NOVEMBER 2004 Oasis Crescent Property Fund sues Judge Desai for alleged defamation. It comes to light that Judge Hlophe had been receiving regular monthly payments from Oasis at the time that he authorised the defamation action. Judge Hlophe initially denies receiving the payments before changing tack and insisting that they were reimbursements for ‘travelling expenses’. Either way, the payments fell foul of Judge Hlophe’s statutory and ethical duties not to receive such payments without the prior approval of the Minister of Justice. FEBRUARY 2005 Judge Hlophe submits a report on alleged racist practices within the Western Cape legal community, directly to

Learn More →

Timeline of Judge Motata’s Removal

DOWNLOAD THE PDF VERSION JANUARY 2007 Judge Motata drives into a residential wall whilst intoxicated and is subsequently involved in a verbal confrontation with the property owner. Judge Motata uses racial slurs, profanities and language of a derogatory nature, all of which is recorded by the owner. The Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace files a complaint against Judge Motata alleging that his conduct brought disgrace upon him and the judiciary and undermined public respect. JULY 2008 Afriforum lodges complaint against Judge Motata alleging that he has committed gross racist misconduct and should therefore be impeached in terms of section 177 of the Constitution. SEPTEMBER

Learn More →

Promoting Democracy Under Law

• Advancing understanding of and respect for the Rule of Law •  Litigating in relation to institutional conduct in conflict with the Rule of Law • Strengthening the independence of the judiciary •  Supporting the legal profession in serving the courts • Enhancing understanding between legal role-players, the media and society at large • Furthering legal education appropriate to the needs of constitutional democracy • Protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the media concerning the administration of justice.

Our mission

FUL’s objectives are the promotion of democracy and the advancement of the Rule of Law and the principle of legality, understanding these to be the foundation for constitutional democracy in South Africa.

How we work

Litigation before the courts

Primarily, FUL uses litigation before the courts as its defining method of promoting and defending the Rule of Law and democracy in South Africa. The composition of its board affords it particular expertise and experience in this area.

Non-profit company

FUL is registered as a non-profit company and a public benefit organisation.

FREEDOM UNDER LAW NPC REG.
NO. 2008 000 384 08

PUBLIC BENEFIT ORGANISATION REF.
NO. 930031764

Address threats to the Rule of Law

Recognising the importance of the criminal justice system to the Rule of Law and the realisation of any number of rights, FUL has since its inception sought to make this a particular focus area, although it directs its efforts wherever it believes it may effectively address threats to the Rule of Law.

Trial observation

However, litigation is not the only distinguishing feature of Freedom Under Law's approach. FUL also undertakes trial observation across the region and seeks to coordinate informed debate of topical regional legal issues.

Board of Directors

Ezra Davids

Ezra Davids, an alumnus of the University of Cape Town (UCT) and Harvard Law School Executive Programme, is Chairman and

READ MORE

Kate Hofmeyr

Kate Hofmeyr is a senior counsel practising at the Johannesburg and Cape Bars. She has a varied practice with a

READ MORE

Beatrice Mtetwa

Beatrice Mtetwa is a Zimbabwe-based lawyer who graduated from the then University of Botswana and Swaziland with an LLB degree

READ MORE

Upcoming Events

Ongoing Cases

Concluded Cases

Richard Mdluli

In September 2020, Richard Mdluli, former head of Crime Intelligence in the SAPS, was sentenced in the High Court, Johannesburg to an effective five years

Learn More →

Serving the Judiciary?

Service Providers

Freedom Under Law expresses its gratitude for the fully pro bono or subsidised professional expertise and time of these agencies. We would not be able to function without this invaluable support.